The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Homework and its Contributions to Learning, 1999-2001
Creator
Greenhough, P., University of Bristol, Graduate School of Education
Hughes, M., University of London, Institute of Education, Thomas Coram Research Unit
Study number / PID
5178 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-5178-1 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.The overall aims of the research were to examine the contribution which homework makes to student learning at Key Stages 2 and 3, and to identify some of the conditions under which this contribution is enhanced or reduced. The main research questions were:
what kind of tasks are set for homework?
to what extent and in what ways do students engage with homework?
what are the main contexts in which homework originates and is carried out, and how is homework perceived and valued within those contexts?
what kinds of support are provided for homework within these contexts?
what effects do pupil characteristics (such as age, gender and learning identity) have on the way in which homework is perceived and carried out?
what are the learning outcomes arising from particular homework tasks?
how do tasks, contexts and pupil characteristics interact with each other to enhance or reduce learning outcomes?
The research was intended to be exploratory and hypothesis-generating. It was therefore based on the in-depth study of how homework is practised and perceived in and around a small number of primary and secondary schools.
Main Topics:The dataset consists of semi-structured qualitative interviews about homework, deriving from a study of practices and perceptions concerning homework, in and around four secondary and four primary schools. The secondary schools served contrasting catchment areas. Two schools had a high proportion of students eligible for free school meals, with most of the students in one of these schools coming from minority ethnic groups. A third school was a city-based church school, which drew students from all over the city, while the fourth served a large rural area. The catchment areas for the primary schools were very similar to the secondary schools, as each primary school was a ‘feeder’ school for one of the secondary schools.
In each secondary school, the research centred on...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/06/1999 - 01/02/2001
Country
England
Time dimension
Cross-sectional (one-time) study
Analysis unit
Individuals
Subnational
Universe
Year 8 students; their parents; teachers in English, maths, science, modern foreign languages and humanities; form tutor; head teacher. Year 5 students; their parents; class teacher; head teacher; a small number of university students, training to be teachers, on school experience. The schools were located in the West of England.
Sampling procedure
stage 1: purposive sampling of school and year group; stage 2: stratified random sampling of students
Kind of data
Text
Semi-structured interviews
Data collection mode
Face-to-face interview
Funding information
Grant number
R000237857
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2005
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available to UK Data Service registered users subject to the End User Licence Agreement.
Commercial use of the data requires approval from the data owner or their nominee. The UK Data Service will contact you.