Abstract
The data material was collected in a controlled experiment that investigated the ability of laypeople to visually assess blood loss and to examine factors that may impact accuracy and the classification of injury severity. A total of 125 laypeople watched 78 short videos each of individuals experiencing a hemorrhage. Victim gender, volume of blood lost, and camera perspective were systematically manipulated in the videos.
The data set consists of four variables: volume estimate, volume error, response time, and classification.
Each variable has a separate sheet in the excel document.
The data is from 125 individuals, each listed on a separate row with a unique ID for each individual.
Each sheet includes the participant ID (anonymous number), age in years, participant sex (0 = male, 1 = female), perspective of the video clip (0 = top view, 1 = front view), and then one column for each victim gender and loss volume combination (24 total). The column label consists of M or F for male and female victim, followed by underscore and the loss volume (e.g., M_50 for male victim with 50 ml of blood loss, or F_1100 for a female victim with 1100 ml of blood loss).
Volume estimates are the participants' estimate of blood loss in ml.
Volume error is the estimate minus the true value, in ml.
Response time is the time it took for participants to classify the bleeding as life-threatening or not, in seconds.
Classification is a value from 0 to 1 for the proportion of times the participant classified that particular gender-volume combination as depicting a life-threatening blood loss .