Summary information

Study title

Perceptions of Autistic and Non-Autistic Adults in Employment Interviews: The Role of Behavioural Impression Management and Interview Structure, 2019-2022

Creator

Maras, K, University of Bath
Norris, J, University of Bristol

Study number / PID

856004 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-856004 (DOI)

Data access

Open

Series

Not available

Abstract

Unless appropriate adaptations are made, social communication and interaction differences mean that employment interviews can be particularly challenging for autistic people. This also makes autism a valuable test case for the influence of Impression Management (IM) on interviewer perceptions of candidates. Two studies are reported, investigating: 1) the extent to which behavioral IM influences rater perceptions of autistic and non-autistic mock interview candidates; and 2) the impact of adapting the interview structure to alleviate the social communication challenges faced by autistic interviewees on this. In the first study, the presence of behavioral cues was manipulated for standard mock employment interviews by using either videos (behavioral cues present) or transcripts (behavioral cues absent). Participants with employment interviewing experience rated their overall impression of the candidates (blind to autism diagnosis). In the second study, a new group of raters viewed videos of the autistic candidates being interviewed with either standard (unadapted) interview questions, or with structured questions (adapted to be more supportive). Study 1 results demonstrated that non-autistic (but not autistic) interviewees gained a ‘video advantage’; benefiting from higher confidence and communication skills ratings when assessed by video compared to transcript. Study 2 found that when interviews were adapted, autistic candidates received higher ratings for conscientiousness (compared to when undergoing unadapted interviews). Findings highlight the importance of IM on employer perceptions in job interviews, conditions that may relatively disadvantage some candidates (i.e., in video, or real-world, interviews), and how these differences in IM could be alleviated (i.e., with adapted interview structure).Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is diagnosed in around 1% of the population and presents a number of challenges to the day-to-day lives of these individuals as...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

01/06/2019 - 14/01/2022

Country

United Kingdom

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Individual

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Numeric

Data collection mode

We assessed rater participants’ impressions of autistic and non-autistic candidates during a mock employment interview (i.e., with standard, unadapted questions). This was assessed utilizing a 2 (Group: autistic vs. non-autistic) × 2 (Format: transcript vs. video) mixed design, whereby Format was within-participants. Lay raters viewed videos and transcripts of autistic and non-autistic adults receiving mock employment interviews (from a previous Study - see Maras et al. 2020) and provided ratings of their impressions.

Funding information

Grant number

ES/N001095/1

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2022

Terms of data access

The Data Collection is available to any user without the requirement for registration for download/access.

Related publications

Not available