The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Young People's Representations of Conflicting Roles in Child Development, 2004-2005
Creator
Crafter, S., University of Northampton
De Abreu, G., Oxford Brookes University
O'Dell, L., University of Brighton, School of Applied Social Science
Cline, T., University of Luton
Study number / PID
5474 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-5474-1 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.The research for this mixed methods study addressed the social construction of child development by investigating young people's experiences of work and ways in which they think about different working activities. Its particular focus is young people who are performing jobs that are commonly assumed to be inappropriate for children and are more often viewed as work for adults. The two atypical work roles chosen for the project were language brokering (translating for a family member) and performing caring duties for an adult family member. The project developed in two phases using mixed methods. A survey of working patterns of 1,002 young people in Years 10 and 12 (aged 15-18) from six schools and colleges in the South East and South Coast of England revealed that 98.4% of males and 99.0% of females had undertaken some form of paid or unpaid work. 6.6% reported that they had acted as a language broker at some time (of whom 71.2% were female). 6.4% reported that they had acted as a carer for an adult at home (of whom 64.5% were female). The second stage involved interviewing 46 of the respondents to the survey about their experiences and representations of both typical and less typical work roles. Thematic analysis of the interviews suggests that the participants overwhelmingly drew on a notion of normal childhood as a way of understanding young people's work. Normal childhood was seen as a time for dependency, education and play and not as a time for work. However this representation does not adequately theorise the lives of the young people in the study who had had experience of atypical work roles. Many of these participants drew concurrently on a view of normal childhood and a more contextualised alternative childhood in which their atypical activities were normalised within specific socio-cultural spaces.
Main Topics:Topics covered included: child development; young people and work;...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/05/2004 - 01/02/2005
Country
England
Time dimension
A two stage project: stage one, a questionnaire survey; and stage two, interviews with a selection of the survey respondents.
Analysis unit
Individuals
Subnational
Universe
The questionnaire drew on a sample of 1,002 young people aged between 15-18 from six schools and sixth form colleges in the South East and South Coast of England during 2004-2005. The interview data was derived from individual interviews with a selected sample of the survey respondents.
Sampling procedure
One-stage cluster sample
Purposive selection/case studies
Kind of data
Text
Numeric
Structured interview questionnaires
Data collection mode
Face-to-face interview
Self-completion
Funding information
Grant number
RES-000-22-0549
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2007
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available to UK Data Service registered users subject to the End User Licence Agreement.
Commercial use of the data requires approval from the data owner or their nominee. The UK Data Service will contact you.