The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Survey of caste, occupation and education in five localities in India 2014-2015
Creator
Shah, A, London School of Economics and Political Science
Study number / PID
853815 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-853815 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
We deposit here the results of a household-based survey that was used to understand the situation of Dalits and Adivasis in five rural localities in Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Telangana and Himachal Pradesh, India. It was part of a wider project based on participation observation - living with the Adivasi and Dalit communities in question for a year -that asked how and why Dalits and Adivasis remained at the bottom of the Indian economic and social hierarchy despite economic growth. This survey sought to document how people made a livelihood (occupation/employment) as well as levels of education by caste/tribe (and within that by gender).In recent decades India has experienced exceptionally high economic growth rates, becoming one of the world's fastest growing major economies. Yet, the redistribution of the fruits of economic growth - the trickle down effects of growth - have been negligible for vast swathes of India's population, most of whom live in the countryside. The demographics of the poor are starkly socially marked. Economists tell us that India's dalit and adivasi communities, who account for almost 25% of the country's population and were historically seen as 'untouchable' and 'savage', suffer from disproportionate levels of poverty, remaining worse off than other groups almost everywhere across the country. But econometric analysis is unable to tell us how and why this is the case.
This project consists of the following three components:
1) primary anthropological research to understand the processes by which poverty is reproduced through agrarian relations and the shift from farm-based social and economic hierarchies towards new forms of power and exploitation off the farm which lead to the persistence of dalit and adivasi marginalisation across India.
2) analytical development in the study of poverty and its persistence which, informed by recent statistical research and policy shifts at the national and state levels, crafts a more...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/12/2013 - 31/03/2019
Country
India
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Household
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Numeric
Data collection mode
Five field locations were selected in five Indian states: Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Telangana, Maharashtra and Himachal Pradesh in order to cover a set of different conditions of Dalit and Adivasis across India.In Tamil Nadu, Telangana and Himachal Pradesh, the 'location' was defined as a revenue village. In Kerala, the location was a Tea Plantation and in Maharashtra 3 interrelated villages were covered. In each location a postdoctoral research fellow undertook a household survey, covering employment and education of all adult household members of all Dalit castes and all Adivasi groups. Where relevant, other caste groups were also included. Sampling varied across sites. Where possible the entire village/site was surveyed - as in the case of Himachal Pradesh and the Kerala tea estate. In Tamil Nadu almost all the Adivasi and Dalit castes were surveyed but there was also data included on a smaller random sample of other castes just for illustration of difference. In Telangana, a 30% random sample across castes was conducted. In Maharashtra, where the focus was on three villages, all villages were surveyed and included 40% of all houses in the hill village (fully Bhil), 15% of all houses in the resettled village (fully Bhil) and 10% of all households in the plain villages (and which included Bhils and Gujars). The researcher carried out participant observation living for a year with the communities. As is common in many anthropological studies of this kind consent was oral and based on the longterm trust developed with informants. Information about survey was also delivered verbally,Detailed information is available in: Alpa Shah, Jens Lerche, Richard Axelby, Dalel Benbabaali, Brendan Donegan, Jayaseelan Raj and Vikramaditya Thakur, 2018: Ground Down by Growth. Tribe, caste, class and inequality in twenty-first-century India. Pluto Press and OUP India.
Funding information
Grant number
ES/K002341/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2019
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service.