Summary information

Study title

Health Governance After Brexit: Street Ethnography and Elite Interviews, 2019-2021

Creator

Hervey, T, University of Sheffield
Antova, I, Queen's University Belfast

Study number / PID

854778 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-854778 (DOI)

Data access

Restricted

Series

Not available

Abstract

Street ethnography was conducted through street interviews in the North of England (Sheffield, Rochdale and Rotherham) and Northern Ireland (Newry, Derry/Londonderry) designed to elicit public understandings of accountability for post-Brexit realities, and hence legitimacy of post-Brexit governance. Ethnographic street interviews are useful for capturing a diffuse public ‘mood’ in particular locations identified as important for expectations about post-Brexit health governance - the ‘left behind’. The term ‘ethnographic’ means these interviews occur in ‘unstructured’ public spaces, like shopping centres or high streets, and are based on unobtrusive questions about abstract concepts. Their aim is to capture intuitive conceptions of key ideas (‘what do you think of when you hear the word accountability?’, for example), in a context where research participants are more likely to give answers reflecting their intuitive expectations and views in a way that more structured methods like focus groups do not. The metaphors people use to describe abstract or complex concepts (such as accountability for post-Brexit governance of health and the NHS) reveal how they frame, experience and understand the world, and key concepts related to it. Transcripts and field notes from the ethnographic interviews have been thematically coded. This contribution is particularly distinctive in political science studies, which tend not to examine ‘everyday’ conceptions of accountability in a broader context of legitimacy. The collection of data from elite stakeholders relevant to the project was carried out in the first instance through semi-structured interviews. Two interviewers (TH and MW) conducted the interviews with co-producer stakeholder participants in their workplaces in England (predominantly London, but also Leeds and Alton, Kent) and one interviewer (MF) conducted the interviews with participants in Northern Ireland/ROI (predominantly Belfast and Dublin).Language such as 'a red,...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

01/02/2019 - 31/01/2021

Country

Ireland, United Kingdom, Northern Ireland, England

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Individual

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Text
Still image

Data collection mode

Street ethnography uses an innovative form of ethnography: ‘vox pop’ street interviews. These interviews enable researchers to get at the ‘snap’ views of the public about abstract concepts, in a way they might think about them on a day-to-day basis, through ‘fast’ thinking (Stoker et al 2016; Kahneman 2011). Following Richardson et al’s (2014) method, individuals are first asked if they are from the local area (if they are not then they are not questioned). The researcher then explains the research project, stating that they are interested in the future governance of the NHS and health in the North of England. Interviews usually last about 10 minutes and involve a semi-structured guideline for the conversation, but the guideline is often not followed, because the method’s focus is on where the person in conversation wants the conversation to go.The nature of the semi-structured interviews required interviewers to have a good idea of what they would like to ask each participant, yet gave plenty of space for conversations to develop in unexpected directions. This was important as the semi-structured interviews formed the jumping off point for the co-produced legal analyses, which are a key project output. Each participant was given a participant information form and a consent form. The participant information sheet was kept by the participant and the consent form was collected by the interviewers. Each interview was recorded with a voice recorder purchased for the project and a full transcript was produced for each interview.

Funding information

Grant number

ES/S00730X/1

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2021

Terms of data access

The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service.

Related publications

Not available