The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Adapted Sex Offender Treatment for Men With Learning Disabilities, 2016-2017
Creator
Hollomotz, A, University of Leeds
Study number / PID
855279 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-855279 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
This dataset includes 5 transcripts from qualitative interviews with program architects at phase 1 of the study and 33 transcripts from qualitative interviews at phase 2 of the study. There are 11 interviews with patients (one in two parts) and a further 22 transcripts of interviews with professionals and carers.Adapted Sex Offender Treatment Programs (ASOTPs) have, as their name implies, been modified from mainstream treatment to meet the learning needs of offenders with intellectual disability (ID). They are designed to increase the offender's sexual knowledge, understanding of victim harm, ability to recognise feelings in themselves and others, to modify offence-justifying thinking and to support individuals to develop relapse prevention skills.
In this project I will explore what works on ASOTPs, for whom, in what contexts, why and how. I seek to make sense of these programs in the contexts in which they take place, in order to illuminate what social factors may help or hinder treatment success. In particular, I will examine how effective links between these forensic healthcare interventions and the offender's living context and social care provision, for instance the nature and level of supervision they receive to manage risk, during and after treatment can enhance outcomes. I aim to translate this knowledge into policy and practice recommendations, in order to inform the future targeting of public resources on the most effective treatment, supported by social care packages that can enhance effectiveness.
I will evaluate two ASOTPs, one in the UK and one in Switzerland. Both deliver group cognitive behavioural therapy, lasting about 18 months. The evaluation will entail three phases. First, a literature review will be followed by interviews with twelve international key academics and practitioners who designed ASOTPs. This will illuminate in what ways ASOTPs are intended to work.
Second, I will explore case studies of men who have attended ASOTPs to...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/03/2016 - 31/10/2017
Country
United Kingdom
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Text
Data collection mode
Phase 1: Leading adapted sex offender treatment programmes in England, the USA and Canada were sampled. For each programme, the programme architects were identified. Those are the therapist practitioners who play a key role within their organization in the design, implementation, review and updating of their programmes.Interviews were semi‐structured and adopted the “teacher–learnermethod”, designed to investigate participants' ideas about how the programmes are intended to work (programme theories).Phase 2: The hospital where this research took place has medium, low secure and step-down services for people with learning disabilities. Treatment groups for men with learning disabilities who have sexually offended were running between 2006 and 2017, treating altogether 33 men to successful completion in 6 cohort groups. After reviewing the 33 patient files a sample of eleven men were selected by the researcher and therapy team for case study research. The aim was to explore a spread of cases at various points of their discharge journey. Interviews with the 11 patients were held in plain language. At the end of each interview men were asked to identify individuals whom the researcher would speak to further about each patient. As a result, a further 22 professionals were interviewed. Interviews with professionals asked further questions about patient’s progress in treatment, journey through the care pathways and the discharge process (if applicable), their risk management capabilities, legal issues and social care support. Each patient was discussed by two to five professionals. Eight professionals commented on more than one patient. At times, this happened within one interview others were done separately.
Funding information
Grant number
ES/L010534/1
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2022
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service. All requests are subject to the permission of the data owner or his/her nominee. Please email the contact person for this data collection to request permission to access the data, explaining your reason for wanting access to the data, then contact our Access Helpdesk.