Summary information

Study title

Adapted Sex Offender Treatment for Men With Learning Disabilities, 2016-2017

Creator

Hollomotz, A, University of Leeds

Study number / PID

855279 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-855279 (DOI)

Data access

Restricted

Series

Not available

Abstract

This dataset includes 5 transcripts from qualitative interviews with program architects at phase 1 of the study and 33 transcripts from qualitative interviews at phase 2 of the study. There are 11 interviews with patients (one in two parts) and a further 22 transcripts of interviews with professionals and carers.Adapted Sex Offender Treatment Programs (ASOTPs) have, as their name implies, been modified from mainstream treatment to meet the learning needs of offenders with intellectual disability (ID). They are designed to increase the offender's sexual knowledge, understanding of victim harm, ability to recognise feelings in themselves and others, to modify offence-justifying thinking and to support individuals to develop relapse prevention skills. In this project I will explore what works on ASOTPs, for whom, in what contexts, why and how. I seek to make sense of these programs in the contexts in which they take place, in order to illuminate what social factors may help or hinder treatment success. In particular, I will examine how effective links between these forensic healthcare interventions and the offender's living context and social care provision, for instance the nature and level of supervision they receive to manage risk, during and after treatment can enhance outcomes. I aim to translate this knowledge into policy and practice recommendations, in order to inform the future targeting of public resources on the most effective treatment, supported by social care packages that can enhance effectiveness. I will evaluate two ASOTPs, one in the UK and one in Switzerland. Both deliver group cognitive behavioural therapy, lasting about 18 months. The evaluation will entail three phases. First, a literature review will be followed by interviews with twelve international key academics and practitioners who designed ASOTPs. This will illuminate in what ways ASOTPs are intended to work. Second, I will explore case studies of men who have attended ASOTPs to...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

01/03/2016 - 31/10/2017

Country

United Kingdom

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Individual

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Text

Data collection mode

Phase 1: Leading adapted sex offender treatment programmes in England, the USA and Canada were sampled. For each programme, the programme architects were identified. Those are the therapist practitioners who play a key role within their organization in the design, implementation, review and updating of their programmes.Interviews were semi‐structured and adopted the “teacher–learnermethod”, designed to investigate participants' ideas about how the programmes are intended to work (programme theories).Phase 2: The hospital where this research took place has medium, low secure and step-down services for people with learning disabilities. Treatment groups for men with learning disabilities who have sexually offended were running between 2006 and 2017, treating altogether 33 men to successful completion in 6 cohort groups. After reviewing the 33 patient files a sample of eleven men were selected by the researcher and therapy team for case study research. The aim was to explore a spread of cases at various points of their discharge journey. Interviews with the 11 patients were held in plain language. At the end of each interview men were asked to identify individuals whom the researcher would speak to further about each patient. As a result, a further 22 professionals were interviewed. Interviews with professionals asked further questions about patient’s progress in treatment, journey through the care pathways and the discharge process (if applicable), their risk management capabilities, legal issues and social care support. Each patient was discussed by two to five professionals. Eight professionals commented on more than one patient. At times, this happened within one interview others were done separately.

Funding information

Grant number

ES/L010534/1

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2022

Terms of data access

The Data Collection is available for download to users registered with the UK Data Service. All requests are subject to the permission of the data owner or his/her nominee. Please email the contact person for this data collection to request permission to access the data, explaining your reason for wanting access to the data, then contact our Access Helpdesk.

Related publications

Not available