The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Within-household Inequalities and Public Policy, 2006-08
Creator
Bennett, F., University of Oxford, Department of Social Policy and Intervention
Sutherland, H., University of Essex
Himmelweit, S., The Open University (OU)
Study number / PID
8317 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-8317-1 (DOI)
Data access
Information not available
Series
Not available
Abstract
Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.The project involved three methods: (1) qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with 60 individuals in 30 couples; (2) quantitative analysis of household panel data (British Household Panel Survey); and (3) use of UK and EU policy simulation models of the tax-benefit system. The aim was to explore how the three approaches could be used to inform each other: for the econometric analysis to build on the qualitative findings, and for policy simulation to take account of within household inequalities beyond those of income, identified by the qualitative and quantitative analysis. The key research questions include: What are the policy-relevant gender specific parameters that affect the distribution of power, entitlements to and use of resources within households in the UK? In particular, do perceptions about entitlements and intra-household distribution of resources depend on the source and recipient of income? How do current and potential policy changes affecting access to different sources of income impact on gender roles and relationships within households? What ambiguities and tensions arise in attempting to improve both the distribution of resources between households and women's access to resources within the household? What lessons can be drawn from the above for developing policies that improve women's financial autonomy?The project aimed to explore alternative approaches to understanding the behavioral and distributional impact of policy change which take account of gender inequalities in power and influence within the household, and to use such approaches to analyse the effects of changes in fiscal, social security and associated labour market policies in the UK. It has focused on approaches to conceptualising and measuring inequalities within male-female couples, and on understanding the concepts of entitlement and financial autonomy and the factors that influence...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/01/2006 - 30/06/2008
Country
Great Britain
Time dimension
Cross-sectional (one-time) study
Analysis unit
Individuals
Families/households
National
Universe
30 men and 30 women in 29 married couples and 1 cohabiting couple in England, Wales, Scotland.
Sampling procedure
No sampling (total universe)
Kind of data
Not available
Data collection mode
Interview
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2019
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is available to UK Data Service registered users subject to the End User Licence Agreement.
Commercial use of the data requires approval from the data owner or their nominee. The UK Data Service will contact you.