The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Evaluation of the Frontline Fast-Track Social Work Training Programme Pilot, 2016
Creator
Scourfield, J., Cardiff University, School of Social Sciences
Study number / PID
8187 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-8187-1 (DOI)
Data access
Open
Series
Not available
Abstract
Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.The Evaluation of the Frontline Fast-Track Social Work Training Programme Pilot, 2016 study is a quasi-experiment involving simulated social work practice that was independently rated by assessors. The dataset includes information about participants’ educational backgrounds and other circumstances and self-evaluation by students, as well as the ratings of assessors.
Frontline is a fast-track social work training programme for England whose pilot phase runs from 2013-2017 with around 230 trainees in the first two cohorts. It is focused on statutory children’s social care in local authorities. It aims to attract graduates with strong academic records and excellent interpersonal skills and the training model is distinctive in being heavily practice-based, using a systemic model and two specific evidence-based practice approaches. The scheme has proved controversial amongst social work educators.
In 2014 the Department for Education (DfE) commissioned Cardiff University to undertake an independent evaluation of the Frontline scheme. The performance of Frontline participants was compared to social work students on mainstream programmes, based at several universities. The results of the evaluation have been published by the DfE.
Given the controversial nature of the scheme, the evaluation team believe it is important to share the simulated practice data. The data will allow researchers to replicate the analysis conducted for the DfE-funded evaluation. Since Frontline selected its participants from a large pool of applicants and with a higher minimum qualification threshold than mainstream programmes, there is likely to be some selection bias affecting the evaluation results. Non-random selection is also a common issue when assessing many other social interventions. To this end, the DfE-funded evaluation attempted to reduce these biases through matching. However, other researchers may wish to...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
01/08/2014 - 01/11/2015
Country
England
Time dimension
Cross-sectional (one-time) study
Analysis unit
Individuals
National
Universe
115 individuals on social work training programmes in England. Of the 115, 49 are enrolled in the Frontline programme and 66 are enrolled on mainstream social work programmes at several different universities.
Sampling procedure
Volunteer sample
Kind of data
Numeric
Data collection mode
Self-completion
Simulation
Audio recording
Actor based social work scenarios
Funding information
Grant number
DFE-RR507
Access
Publisher
UK Data Service
Publication year
2017
Terms of data access
The Data Collection is to be made available to any user without the requirement for registration for download/access under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence.