The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
The open economy and its enemies: Public Attitudes in East Asia and Eastern Europe
Creator
Duckett, J, University of Glasgow
Miller, W, University of Glasgow
Study number / PID
852350 (UKDA)
10.5255/UKDA-SN-852350 (DOI)
Data access
Restricted
Series
Not available
Abstract
Despite vigorous debates about the meaning and significance of globalisation, it is broadly agreed that there has been a recent trend for relatively closed economies and societies to open up and become more integrated/exposed. This project focuses on this narrower theme of economic and cultural openness. It will investigate public attitudes towards openness within selected developing / transitional countries in east Asia and east Europe. For the purposes of this research, support for openness is defined broadly to include accepting, tolerating, even perhaps welcoming and celebrating foreign ideas, foreign customs, symbols, capital, and personnel (including internationally mobile professionals and managers, rich tourists, foreign employers, poor immigrants and guest workers).
The project will use survey/focus-group methods rather than the ethnographic methods which have been more conventional for research in this area. We regard these alternative approaches as complementary, but the balance has tilted so far towards ethnographic methods that the potential contribution of carefully designed surveys/focus-groups, along with their emphasis on the broad mass of the unorganised public, has been neglected. From a democratic perspective, public opinion in developing/transitional countries is important in itself. But it also constitutes the background against which elites and activists must operate. And it is also important for development, since public resistance to outside influences can affect political stability, thereby encouraging protectionism and discouraging inward investment. Even veteran critics of free-market forces now accept that there is no plausible alternative to the market economy. But there remains a consensus that opening-up economies has not so far helped the poor and weak as much as it should. It has spurred development in the short run, but in a form that threatens longer-term development. The increasing inequality and corruption associated...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
15/02/2002 - 30/09/2005
Country
Czech Republic, South Korea, Ukraine, Vietnam
Time dimension
Not available
Analysis unit
Group
Individual
Universe
Not available
Sampling procedure
Not available
Kind of data
Numeric
Text
Data collection mode
Data was collected using face-to-face interviews and focus group discussions. Data was collected from: (1) general public (representative national samples) and (2) elected and appointed officials (beneath national level). The achieved sample size was for public: 1688 In Czech Republic, 1500 in South Korea, 1500 in Ukraine and 1500 in Vietnam. As for officials: 510 in Czech Republic, 504 in South Korea, 500 in Ukraine and 500 in Vietnam.In Ukraine, data collected from the public were: 2136 in the post-revolution wave (plus another 2000 from the first wave of interviews). Therefore the data is cross-sectional one-time study in 3 countries (Czech Republic, South Korea, Vietnam) and repeated cross-sectional, two-wave in Ukraine.