Summary information

Study title

The open economy and its enemies: Public Attitudes in East Asia and Eastern Europe

Creator

Duckett, J, University of Glasgow
Miller, W, University of Glasgow

Study number / PID

852350 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-852350 (DOI)

Data access

Restricted

Series

Not available

Abstract

Despite vigorous debates about the meaning and significance of globalisation, it is broadly agreed that there has been a recent trend for relatively closed economies and societies to open up and become more integrated/exposed. This project focuses on this narrower theme of economic and cultural openness. It will investigate public attitudes towards openness within selected developing / transitional countries in east Asia and east Europe. For the purposes of this research, support for openness is defined broadly to include accepting, tolerating, even perhaps welcoming and celebrating foreign ideas, foreign customs, symbols, capital, and personnel (including internationally mobile professionals and managers, rich tourists, foreign employers, poor immigrants and guest workers). The project will use survey/focus-group methods rather than the ethnographic methods which have been more conventional for research in this area. We regard these alternative approaches as complementary, but the balance has tilted so far towards ethnographic methods that the potential contribution of carefully designed surveys/focus-groups, along with their emphasis on the broad mass of the unorganised public, has been neglected. From a democratic perspective, public opinion in developing/transitional countries is important in itself. But it also constitutes the background against which elites and activists must operate. And it is also important for development, since public resistance to outside influences can affect political stability, thereby encouraging protectionism and discouraging inward investment. Even veteran critics of free-market forces now accept that there is no plausible alternative to the market economy. But there remains a consensus that opening-up economies has not so far helped the poor and weak as much as it should. It has spurred development in the short run, but in a form that threatens longer-term development. The increasing inequality and corruption associated...
Read more

Topics

Methodology

Data collection period

15/02/2002 - 30/09/2005

Country

Czech Republic, South Korea, Ukraine, Vietnam

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Group
Individual

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Numeric
Text

Data collection mode

Data was collected using face-to-face interviews and focus group discussions. Data was collected from: (1) general public (representative national samples) and (2) elected and appointed officials (beneath national level). The achieved sample size was for public: 1688 In Czech Republic, 1500 in South Korea, 1500 in Ukraine and 1500 in Vietnam. As for officials: 510 in Czech Republic, 504 in South Korea, 500 in Ukraine and 500 in Vietnam.In Ukraine, data collected from the public were: 2136 in the post-revolution wave (plus another 2000 from the first wave of interviews). Therefore the data is cross-sectional one-time study in 3 countries (Czech Republic, South Korea, Vietnam) and repeated cross-sectional, two-wave in Ukraine.

Funding information

Grant number

R000239581

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2016

Terms of data access

Not available

Related publications

Not available