Summary information

Study title

Best practices in sharing individual level health research data in low and middle income settings: A qualitative study of views of stakeholders in India

Creator

Osrin, D, University College London
Jayaraman, A, SNEHA India

Study number / PID

852005 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-852005 (DOI)

Data access

Restricted

Series

Not available

Abstract

Transcripts of in-depth interviews and group discussions with managers, researchers, ethics committee members, field data collectors and community members on the issues around ethical data sharing in the context of research involving women and children in urban India. We interviewed researchers, managers, and research participants associated with a Mumbai non-governmental organization, as well as researchers from other organizations and members of ethics committees. We conducted 22 individual semi-structured interviews and involved 44 research participants in focus group discussions. We used framework analysis to examine ideas about data and data sharing in general; its potential benefits or harms, barriers, obligations, and governance; and the requirements for consent. Both researchers and participants were generally in favor of data sharing, although limited experience amplified their reservations.

It is increasingly recognized that effective and appropriate data sharing requires the development of models of good data sharing practice capable of taking seriously both the potential benefits to be gained and the importance of ensuring that the rights and interests of participants are respected and that risk of harms is minimized. Calls for the greater sharing of individual level data from biomedical and public health research are receiving support among researchers and research funders. Despite its potential importance, data sharing presents important ethical, social, and institutional challenges in low income settings. This dataset comprises qualitative research conducted in India, exploring the experiences of key research stakeholders and their views about what constitutes good data sharing practice.

Methodology

Data collection period

01/01/2013 - 31/10/2014

Country

India

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Group
Individual
Organization

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Text

Data collection mode

In-depth semi-structured individual interviews with 22 managers, researchers and ethics committee members.In-depth semi-structured focus group discussions with 44 field data collectors and community members.Detailed methodology information is available in the linked paper.

Funding information

Grant number

Unknown

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2015

Terms of data access

Not available

Related publications

Not available