Summary information

Study title

Dataset belonging to Thin-slice judgments of children's social status and behavior

Creator

T.A.M. Lansu (Radboud University)
Y.H.M. van den Berg (Radboud University)

Study number / PID

doi:10.17026/dans-xns-cmre (DOI)

662774 (Metis ID)

easy-dataset:184693 (DANS-KNAW)

Data access

Information not available

Series

Not available

Abstract

The moment a child walks into a new classroom, teachers and classmates form an impression based on minimal information. Yet, little is known about the accuracy of such impressions when it concerns children’s social functioning at school. The current study examined the accuracy of children’s, teachers’ and adults’ impressions of 18 unacquainted children based on thin slices of behavior. The likeability, popularity, prosocial behavior, aggression, and exclusion of these children were judged by 101 children, 79 elementary school teachers, and 68 young adults based on 20-second video clips. Judges were better than chance in predicting popularity and prosocial behavior, but worse than chance in predicting aggression and exclusion. Female judges were more accurate judging social exclusion of same-sex than other-sex targets. Teachers were more accurate than children in their judgments of prosocial behavior. The current study shows that confidence in one’s impression of especially aggression and exclusion in unacquainted children based on minimal information is not warranted.

Topics

Not available

Methodology

Data collection period

Not available

Country

Time dimension

Not available

Analysis unit

Not available

Universe

Not available

Sampling procedure

Not available

Kind of data

Not available

Data collection mode

Not available

Access

Publisher

DANS Data Station Social Sciences and Humanities

Publication year

2020

Terms of data access

Not available

Related publications

Not available