Summary information

Study title

Assistant Roles and Changing Job Boundaries in the Public Services, 2004-2005

Creator

Kessler, I., University of Oxford, Templeton College

Study number / PID

5343 (UKDA)

10.5255/UKDA-SN-5343-1 (DOI)

Data access

Restricted

Series

Not available

Abstract

Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.This research project examined three assistant roles in different parts of the public services: the teaching assistant in education; the social work assistant in social care and the healthcare assistant in health care. While central to the process of workforce restructuring in the context of public service 'modernisation', it was suggested that the assistant role had, nonetheless, been subject to relative neglect by policymakers and researchers. Such neglect prompted an exploration of the nature and consequences of these roles. In particular, whether they assumed a similar form across the public services, suggesting a common core, or differed within and between sub-sectors, implying some sensitivity to context. The research aimed to address two sets of questions. The first revolved around the nature of the assistant role, including entry, performance and management: what kind of people became assistants and how did they enter the role? What tasks did assistants undertake and to what extent did the role challenge traditional job boundaries? How were assistants treated in terms of reward, involvement, training and development? The second set related to the consequences of the role for different stakeholders (assistants, professionals and service users): was this a 'high quality' job for assistants, with stimulating work and career opportunities or a 'poor quality' role picking up routine work, with few prospects? Was the assistant role a chance to unload 'unnecessary' burdens so allowing professionals to concentrate on 'core' activities or did it represent an additional responsibility and a threat to professional identity? For service users, was the assistant seen as a more accessible and less intimidating service provider, or, since not a professional, viewed as a 'second best' option? Survey and interview data were collected from two local education authorities (covering five primary...
Read more

Methodology

Data collection period

01/10/2004 - 01/02/2005

Country

England

Time dimension

Cross-sectional (one-time) study

Analysis unit

Individuals
Subnational

Universe

Teaching assistants and teachers from five schools, and social work assistants and social workers from six social service departments in England. The exact locations have not been disclosed for confidentiality reasons.

Sampling procedure

No sampling (total universe)

Kind of data

Numeric

Data collection mode

Postal survey
Self-completion

Funding information

Grant number

RES-000-23-0069

Access

Publisher

UK Data Service

Publication year

2006

Terms of data access

The Data Collection is available to UK Data Service registered users subject to the End User Licence Agreement.

Commercial use of the data requires approval from the data owner or their nominee. The UK Data Service will contact you.

Related publications

Not available