The catalogue contains study descriptions in various languages. The system searches with your search terms from study descriptions available in the language you have selected. The catalogue does not have ‘All languages’ option as due to linguistic differences this would give incomplete results. See the User Guide for more detailed information.
Individual datasets that do not belong to any series.
Abstract
The survey charted Finnish perceptions of the image and services of parishes of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland. The study was funded by the individual parishes or parish unions in the studied regions and by the Church Council of the Evangelical Lutheran Church so that all parties funded 1/13 of the study, except for the Helsinki Parish Union which funded twice the amount. First, the respondents were asked to describe a specific parish, which was determined by their municipality of residence, with one adjective. The general impression the respondents had of the parish (positive, neutral or negative) was surveyed, and the respondents were also presented with word pairs and asked which alternative they thought described the parish best (e.g. from very liberal to very conservative and very close to very distant). Next, the significance of various parish services for the respondents was examined, for example, whether it was important to them that the parish takes care of the disadvantaged, supports in the crises of life, organises activities for children and youth, and communicates actively. The respondents were also asked to evaluate how well the parish had succeeded in the same matters. Next, the respondents were asked what they thought were the most important matters the parish should focus on in organising activities. The channels and situations through which the respondents had come across the parish, for example, on traditional or social media, in concerts, or through receiving help from the parish, were also charted. The respondents were then asked how often they participated in activities organised by the parish (e.g. weekly, monthly, never). The respondents' religiosity and religious behaviour were examined with questions regarding how often they prayed, whether they were a godparent, and how they perceived being a godparent (e.g. whether they associated the concept of 'duty of honour' or 'gift giver' with the role of a godparent). Finally, the...
Terminology used is generally based on DDI controlled vocabularies: Time Method, Analysis Unit, Sampling Procedure and Mode of Collection, available at CESSDA Vocabulary Service.
Methodology
Data collection period
31/07/2018 - 11/10/2018
Country
Finland
Time dimension
Cross-section
Analysis unit
Individual
Universe
Finnish population aged over 18 years residing in 12 municipalities or parish union areas (Helsinki, Oulu, Tampere, Turku, Vantaa, Jyväskylä, Kuopio, Pori, Seinäjoki, Hämeenlinna, Rovaniemi, Salo)
Sampling procedure
Probability: Simple random
Kind of data
Quantitative
Data collection mode
Telephone interview: Computer-assisted (CATI)
Access
Publisher
Finnish Social Science Data Archive
Publication year
2020
Terms of data access
The dataset is (B) available for research, teaching and study.
Related publications
Kirkon tutkimuskeskus (2021) Seurakuntien tunnettuuskysely 2021. Raportti. Kirkon tutkimuskeskus.