2026-05-02T08:45:57Z https://datacatalogue.cessda.eu/oai-pmh/v0/oai

e2f6904c532b83b7db82404fadff6d948da7bb8e2b8ba66b6a818ffee5970432 2026-03-09T02:20:52Z language:enopenaire_data

City & Co City & Co doi:10.17026/SS/XF03F7 J. van Hoof L. Ivan J. Perek-Białas J. Kazak UMO- 2021/03/Y/HS6/00213Contract nr: 298 ⁄ 2022Grant Agreement No. 101003758 DANS Data Station Social Sciences and Humanities Earth and Environmental SciencesMedicine, Health and Life SciencesSocial Sciencesage-friendly citiesurban ageingolder peopleAFCCQgeoportal Aim: City&Co aimed to develop an innovative tool for a community-based, mixed validated quantitative and qualitative assessment of age-friendly cities, that can be used in multiple countries. This tool, called Geoportal, should help cities to plan for and implement age-friendly strategies using direct input from older citizens. Moreover, this tool itself has been developed with the active involvement of both older people and policy makers (city workers), in order to build capacity through local ecosystems at the city- and neighbourhood level. To provide guidance for the tool’s implementation and execution of plans, manuals and a manifesto have been published. Four cities were involved: The Hague in the Netherlands, Kraków and Wrocław in Poland and Bucharest in Romania. Methodology & data: The geoportal followed the user-centred design approach: a web-based solution for city workers, using Geographical Information Systems (GIS), with an integrated audit tool to be used by older citizens. We build on the quantifiable spatial indicators’ framework by Davern et al. [2020], which assists the assessment of age-friendly cities using a GIS methodology. In addition, outcomes are superimposed over socio-environmental vulnerability data from the 4 cities through a map overlay approach [Szewrański et al., 2018]. The integrated audit tool was co-created with older citizens from the four cities using multiple co-creation sessions. Multiple data used in the geoportal were collected through various methods: 1) Quantitative survey data of four AFCCQs, which were translated and validated using the Consensus-based Standards for Selection of Health Measurement Instruments, supplemented by additional questions on sustainability. Data were collected in four cities: The Hague, Kraków, Wrocław and Bucharest; 2) Qualitative pictures and comments tagged to a GPS location taken of public spaces and neighbourhoods by older people in the four cities using the geoportal over a three to six-month period, following the work by Barrie et al. [2019] and a community-based approach where older people are involved as citizen scientists. A hot spot analysis was made when evaluating the geoportal, showing the results on city maps. In addition, three co-creation sessions in the four cities were conducted, two with older people and one with older people and city workers together, to draft a strategic age-friendly agenda on evidence-informed policy and actions using the data collected in the project as content, resulting in a manifesto, published in four languages. 2022-03-012023-03-012022-11-012023-03-012023-11-012024-06-062024-04-012024-11-01 https://ssh.datastations.nl/oai doi:10.17026/SS/XF03F7 2026-03-03T01:00:51Z ddi:codebook:2_5