2026-04-27T09:31:02Z https://datacatalogue.cessda.eu/oai-pmh/v0/oai

caac96d7366dc7bdf23b08efcfa7561bc290b3216c940914e2c520cc86abd8d8 2025-11-03T01:01:01Z language:sllanguage:en

Slovene Public Opinion Survey 1992/2 Arhiv druzboslovnih podatkov ADP, 2025ADP, 2025 ADP DDIADP DDI Slovensko javno mnenje 1992/2 Slovene Public Opinion Survey 1992/2 Slovene Public Opinion Survey 1992/2: International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) 1992 Social Inequality IISlovensko javno mnenje 1992/2: Mednarodna raziskava o neenakosti in socialno-ekonomskih orientacijah SJM922URN:SI:UNI-LJ-FDV:ADP:SJM922https://doi.org/10.17898/ADP_SJM922_V1SJM922URN:SI:UNI-LJ-FDV:ADP:SJM922https://doi.org/10.17898/ADP_SJM922_V1 Toš, Niko Toš, Niko 19921992 Ministrstvo za znanost in tehnologijoMinistrstvo za znanost in tehnologijo = Ministry of Science and Technology Univerza v Ljubljani, Arhiv družboslovnih podatkovUniversity of Ljubljana, Slovenian Social Science Data Archives 6. oktober 20256. October 2025 ADP DDIADP DDI Slovensko javno mnenje 1992/2 dejavniki napredovanjamožnosti napredovanjanagrajevanjevzroki neenakostiodnos do družbenih razlikdejanski in zaželeni zaslužki poklicevsocialna vloga državeocena davčnega sistemaprisotnost družbenih konfliktovmedgeneracijska mobilnost respondentaprakse in načrti za pridobivanje dodatnega zaslužkaglavni viri zagotavljanja življenjskega standardaocena življenjskega standardaocene gospodarskega sistemaopremljenost gospodinjstvaglavne naloge vladeocene političnega sistemapripravljenost za neformalno politično participacijoocena sedanjih in prihodnjih političnih razmerlevo-desno opredeljevanjestrankarske simpatijeugledni politikiDRUŽBENA NEENAKOSTVREDNOTASTALIŠČEZADOVOLJSTVOŽIVLJENJSKE RAZMERESOCIALNO-EKONOMSKI POLOŽAJDRUŽBENA MOBILNOSTPOLITIKAfactors of promotionpossibilities for promotionrewardscauses of inequalityattitude towards social differencesincome according to occupationsocial role of the stateevaluation of tax systempresence of social conflictsintergenerational mobility of respondentpractices and plans for obtaining additional earningsmain sources of assuring life standardestimation of life standardevaluation of economic situationhousehold equipmentpriorities of governmentevaluation of political systemreadiness for informal political participationestimation of current and future political circumstancesleft-right orientationparty preferencesrespectable politiciansSOCIAL INEQUALITYVALUESATTITUDESSATISFACTIONLIVING CONDITIONSSOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUSSOCIAL MOBILITYPOLITICS Socialne struktureDružbeno vedenje in stališčaEnakost, neenakost in družbena izključenostSTALIŠČA O NEENAKOSTISOCIALNO EKONOMSKE RAZMEREOCENA POLITIČNEGA SISTEMASocial structuresSocial behaviour and attitudesEquality, inequality and social exclusionATTITUDES TOWARD INEQUALITYSOCIO-ECONOMIC CONDITIONSEVALUATION OF POLITICAL SYSTEM Prvo poglavje vprašalnika je slovenski prevod mednarodnega vprašalnika ISSP92. Začne se z ocenami dejavnikov napredovanja v življenju. Vsebovana so stališča do družbenih razlik, kdaj so upravičene, ali jih je potrebno zmanjšati. Respondentje ocenjujejo, kakšen je dejanski dohodek izbranih poklicnev in kakšen bi bil upravičen. Ocenjujejo različne oblike obdavčevanja, poseganje države pri uravnavanju neenakosti. Podana je samoocena lastnega družbenega položaja ter podatki o socialnem izvoru ter družbeni mobilnosti. Ocenjen je družbeni prestiž posameznih poklicev. Drugi del pa ponavlja raziskavo Barometer novih demokracij / New Democracies Barometer (NDB). Ta zajema blok vprašanj na temo ocenjevanja individualne ekonomske moči, nakupovalnih namer, virov zaslužka, načinov preživetja ter splošne ocene gospodarske situacije v državi, ter materialnega položaja gospodinjstva. Sledijo ocene političih razmer in problemov, protestni potencial in verjetnost izbruha konfliktov.The first part of the survey replicates the ISSP inequality series, and the second one the NDB Questionnaire. The ISSP questionnaire focused on judgement on social justice and social differences in the country. Social prestige of respondent and selected occupations. Topics: Most important prerequisites for personal success in society (scale); attitude to the welfare state and social differences (scale); chances to increase personal standard of living; importance of differentiated payment; higher payment with acceptance of increased responsibility; higher payment as incentive for additional qualification of workers; availability of inequality of society; increased income expectation as motive for taking up studies; good profits for entrepreneurs as best prerequisite for increase in general standard of living; insufficient solidarity of the normal population as reason for the persistence of social inequalities; estimate of average annual income of selected occupational groups and information on a justified income for the members of these occupational groups from the point of view of the respondent; judgement on the income differences in the country; reduction of income differences, employment guarantee, guaranteed minimum income and equal opportunities for children of poorer families in university admission as government task; attitude to a reduction of government taxes for those of low income; approval of government support for unemployed; judgement on total taxation for recipients of high, middle and low income; perceived social conflicts in the country; self-classification on a top-bottom scale; social mobility; social origins; education status, responsibility accepted, span of control, family responsibility, good work performance or hard work as most important criteria for establishing work pay; income increase or income reduction of individual income in case of a hypothetical equalisation of the total income of the population; personal self-employment and occupation at start of employment; description of current condition of social pyramid as well as assessment of the situation 30 years ago as well as in 30 years; self-classification on a social prestige scale as well as classification of selected occupations. The NDB part of questionnaire includes topics: getting by with a multiplicity of economies--monetized and non-monetized; economic portfolios: defensive, enterprising, vulnerable, and marginal; evaluations of past, present and future political regimes; parties and elections; alternatives to pluralist democracy; social protection from poverty. Demography includes hours worked each week; employment in private or public sector; span of control; company size; personal union membership and membership of spouse; religiousness; self-classification of social class affiliation; party preference; party inclination; residential status; self-classification on a left-right scale; regional origins. februar 1992februar 1992February 1992February 1992 SlovenijaSlovenia SlovenijaSlovenia PosameznikIndividualIndividualIndividual Osebe starejše od 18 let, s stalnim prebivališčem v R Sloveniji.Institucionalizirani prebivalci, kot so dijaki in študentje v domovih, osebe na služenju vojaškega roka, osebe na zdravljenju v bolnišnicah in drugi, ki ne živijo na svojem stalnem naslovu.The adult residents of the Republic of Slovenia, older than 18 years, living on permanent address.Institutionalised people. ŠtevilskiNumericNumericNumeric PresečnoCrossSectionCross-sectionCrossSection Verjetnostno: po skupinah: stratificirano slučajnoProbability.Cluster.StratifiedRandomProbability: Cluster: Stratified randomProbability.Cluster.StratifiedRandom Osebni intervju: PAPIInterview.FaceToFace.PAPIFace-to-face interview: Paper-and-pencil (PAPI)Interview.FaceToFace.PAPI Strukturiran vprašalnikQuestionnaire.StructuredStructured questionnaireQuestionnaire.Structured Arhiv izroča podatke uporabnikom samo za namen, ki ga posebej opredelijo, ob zagotovitvi spoštovanja profesionalnih etičnih kodeksov. Uporabnik se posebej zaveže, da bo skrbel za tajnost podatkov in opravljal analize brez poskusov identifikacije posameznika.Users may use the data only for the purposes stated in the registration form and in accordance with professional codes of ethics. Users expressly agree to maintain the confidentiality of the data and to conduct analyses without attempting to identify the individuals and institutions covered by the materials. Pri objavah, ki bi sledile na podlagi podatkov, je treba polno citirati avtorja in Arhiv.The users should acknowledge in any publication both the original depositors and the Archive. Vsak uporabnik je dolžan opozoriti na morebitne pomanjkljivosti gradiva.Users are requested to notify the Archive of any errors discovered in the materials. Uporabnik naj pred uporabo pozorno prebere spremljajočo dokumentacijo in se v primeru nejasnosti obrne na avtorje raziskave ali Arhiv.In case of ambiguity the users of the data set are advised to contact principal investigators or Archive. Poročila iz raziskave "Slovensko javno mnenje 69" Slovensko javno mnenje 1992/2 [Podatki (P)] Slovensko javno mnenje 1992/2 [Data (P)] http://127.0.0.1:6003/v0/oai SJM922 2025-10-23T19:53:23Z ddi:codebook:2_5