2026-05-30T20:53:30Z https://datacatalogue.cessda.eu/oai-pmh/v0/oai

7fedd3fd73b1059d051637b52a1b4054341036b5e735912323b956e1bc5ab6ba 2025-12-08T02:09:39Z language:enopenaire_data

No evidence for testosterone’s causal effect on decision-making under risk and ambiguity: A pre-registered triple-blind single-dose administration study in females No evidence for testosterone’s causal effect on decision-making under risk and ambiguity: A pre-registered triple-blind single-dose administration study in females doi:10.17026/DANS-ZYK-45HA647841easy-dataset:160832 I.C. Woyke I. Ikink V.R. Heuvelmans K. Roelofs B. Figner 2020-01-01 DANS Data Station Social Sciences and Humanities 2020-03-12 Social SciencesTestosteroneDecision MakingRisk TakingAmbiguityUncertainty <p>The datasets in this archive contain all processed data of which the results are described in ‘No evidence for testosterone’s causal effect on decision-making under risk and ambiguity: A pre-registered triple-blind single-dose administration study in females’ (Woyke, Ikink, Heuvelmans, Roelofs, & Figner, Hormones and Behavior, 2020, forthcoming). The paper investigates the causal effect of testosterone on ambiguous and risky choice in the gain and loss domain, using a triple-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, between-subjects design with 80 healthy female participants (18-27 years; M=21.4, SD=2.1). All analyses were pre-registered, and both researchers and reviewers remained blind to the treatment conditions (testosterone/placebo) until the manuscript was revised for publication. Participants received 0.5mg of testosterone or a matched placebo using a well-established, oral administration procedure, and completed 3.5h to 4.5h later a shortened version of the Risk and Ambiguity Task (RAT) described by Tymula et al. (2012, 2013). The documentation and codebook file describes the content of the datasets.</p> https://ssh.datastations.nl/oai doi:10.17026/DANS-ZYK-45HA 2025-12-03T01:00:29Z ddi:codebook:2_5