2026-06-27T12:25:32Z https://datacatalogue.cessda.eu/oai-pmh/v0/oai

7427a0eea5c3e7930fc9997657cae0a757bae6dea1f770bbd9be4a64fdadf2e5 2026-06-02T13:14:04Z language:enopenaire_data

Dataset belonging to Adolescent victim types across the popularity status hierarchy: Differences in internalizing symptoms Dataset belonging to Adolescent victim types across the popularity status hierarchy: Differences in internalizing symptoms doi:10.17026/DANS-ZJ8-KBA2696188easy-dataset:230571 S.T. Malamut M. Dawes Y.H.M. van den Berg T.A.M. Lansu D. Schwartz A.H.N. Cillessen 2021-01-01 DANS Data Station Social Sciences and Humanities 2021-11-05 Social SciencesVictimizationPopularityHigh-status victimsInternalizingPerson-oriented analysesmulti-informant <p>The current study used latent profile analysis to identify subgroups of victims based on victimization (self- and peer-reported) and popularity (peer-reported). This study sought to (1) verify the existence of popular victims and (2) compare victim subgroups on loneliness and self-esteem. Participants were 804 Dutch adolescents (50.2% boys, Mage = 13.65 years). Results revealed six subgroups, including a group of popular self-identified victims. Popular self-identified victims were generally less lonely than other victims, but were more lonely and had lower self-esteem than non-victims. Implications for understanding the victimization experiences of high-status youth are discussed.</p><p>All information about the content of the files is described in 'read me.pdf'. This file also contains information about the recruitment, participants and data collection. Data and the syntax for the descriptive statistics and all analyses as presented in the paper are also stored.</p> https://ssh.datastations.nl/oai doi:10.17026/DANS-ZJ8-KBA2 2025-12-03T01:00:36Z ddi:codebook:2_5