2026-06-24T15:27:50Z https://datacatalogue.cessda.eu/oai-pmh/v0/oai

72aa4284afdffff08ad32af0603a7c268853494ae0df8effa2689f03507ed918 2026-06-02T13:13:29Z language:enopenaire_data

Comparison of two models for serious games analysis Comparison of two models for serious games analysis doi:10.17026/DANS-ZEG-UXPHeasy-dataset:61122 M. B. Carvalho 2015-04-01 DANS Data Station Social Sciences and Humanities 2015-04-01 Arts and HumanitiesSocial SciencesSerious gameseducational serious gamesserious games analysisserious games design <p>In this study, we investigated users' perception of the usability and usefulness of two models for educational serious games analysis: Activity Theory-based Model of Serious Games (ATMSG) and Learning Mechanics–Game Mechanics (LM–GM). The goal was to obtain early user feedback on ATMSG in order to address issues, particularly on usability, before proceeding with more extensive user testing.</p><p>The article will be available shortly. The authors version of the article has been uploaded in this dataset (carvalho2015a.pdf). README.txt has been converted out of README.md by a DANS datamanager for sustainability purposes.</p> https://ssh.datastations.nl/oai doi:10.17026/DANS-ZEG-UXPH 2025-12-03T01:00:45Z ddi:codebook:2_5