<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='/oai/static/oai2.xsl' ?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-04-16T15:37:15Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="6f5b3064abf0746d597ca4ba7f5b897622aebfee45ae38602f2b9d230b32af6e" metadataPrefix="oai_ddi25" verb="GetRecord">https://datacatalogue.cessda.eu/oai-pmh/v0/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
    <header>
      <identifier>6f5b3064abf0746d597ca4ba7f5b897622aebfee45ae38602f2b9d230b32af6e</identifier>
      <datestamp>2025-12-08T01:31:14Z</datestamp>
      <setSpec>language:en</setSpec><setSpec>openaire_data</setSpec>
    </header>
      <metadata>
        <codeBook xmlns="ddi:codebook:2_5" version="2.5" xsi:schemaLocation="ddi:codebook:2_5 http://www.ddialliance.org/Specification/DDI-Codebook/2.5/XMLSchema/codebook.xsd">
    <docDscr>
      <citation>
        <titlStmt>
          <titl xml:lang="en">TBS-behandeling geprofileerd (projectnummer 1897)</titl>
        </titlStmt>
        <prodStmt>
        </prodStmt>
      </citation>
    </docDscr>
  <stdyDscr>
    <citation>
      <titlStmt>
        <titl xml:lang="en">TBS-behandeling geprofileerd (projectnummer 1897)</titl>
        <IDNo xml:lang="en" agency="DOI">doi:10.17026/DANS-XG5-P7GZ</IDNo><IDNo xml:lang="en">WODC projectnummer 1897</IDNo><IDNo xml:lang="en" agency="DANS-KNAW">easy-dataset:56884</IDNo>
      </titlStmt>
      <rspStmt>
        <AuthEnty xml:lang="en">Het Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- en Documentatiecentrum (WODC)
        </AuthEnty>
      </rspStmt>
      <prodStmt>
        <prodDate xml:lang="en">2011-08-23</prodDate>
      </prodStmt>
      <distStmt>
        <distrbtr xml:lang="en">DANS Data Station Social Sciences and Humanities</distrbtr>
        <distDate xml:lang="en" date="2014-01-28">2014-01-28</distDate>
      </distStmt>
      <verStmt>
      </verStmt>
      <holdings xml:lang="en" URI="https://doi.org/10.17026/DANS-XG5-P7GZ"/>
    </citation>
    <stdyInfo>
      <subject>
        <keyword xml:lang="en">Law</keyword><keyword xml:lang="en">Social Sciences</keyword>
      </subject>
      <abstract xml:lang="en">&lt;p&gt;After several serious incidents with patients with a criminal justice order of enforced care&lt;br&gt;by the state (TBS1) during unsupervised leave, the Lower House decided in 2006 to start a&lt;br&gt;parliamentary inquiry into the functioning of the TBS system (the Visser commission). The&lt;br&gt;commission reached the conclusion that the TBS system in general meets the tasks set to it,&lt;br&gt;yet that it is necessary to adapt its execution to modern standards. One of the commission’s&lt;br&gt;recommendations was to carry out more scientific research on the effectiveness of&lt;br&gt;treatment in forensic psychiatry. To this end, the Scientific Research and Documentation&lt;br&gt;Centre (WODC) drew up a TBS research programme, in cooperation with the TBS field&lt;br&gt;and relevant actors. For the purpose of this TBS research programme a study was needed&lt;br&gt;that would take stock of and describe the current execution of the TBS sentence.&lt;br&gt;This report is the reflection of this stock-taking and descriptive study and of a&lt;br&gt;quantitative analysis of a representative sample of prisoners sentenced to TBS. The study&lt;br&gt;consists of two parts. The first part presented a description of the characteristics of the&lt;br&gt;research population, the execution of the TBS sentence, the design of this execution, the&lt;br&gt;formal legal framework, the bottlenecks and the question in which ways the execution –&lt;br&gt;and more specifically the treatment - is in keeping with the scientific research. In the&lt;br&gt;second part, the profiles of the group of studied prisoners sentenced to TBS were drawn&lt;br&gt;up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this study, we have used four research methods to answer the research questions: a&lt;br&gt;synthesis of the literature, file research, interviews and focus groups. The aim of the&lt;br&gt;literature synthesis was to answer the research questions from a theoretical point of view&lt;br&gt;and to provide insight into the evidence-based treatment methods within the forensic&lt;br&gt;domain. The objective of the file research was, among other things, to gain an&lt;br&gt;understanding of different aspects regarding patients and their treatment. The semistructured&lt;br&gt;interviews were conducted to gain insight into the execution of the TBS&lt;br&gt;sentence and in questions that could not be answered by means of the file research. Finally,&lt;br&gt;we established three focus groups to provide an opportunity to key figures (treatment&lt;br&gt;directors, therapists and researchers) to reflect on the most important research results. The&lt;br&gt;focus groups also gave input regarding aspects of the research that were insufficiently&lt;br&gt;illuminated by means of the file research.&lt;br&gt;The sample size of the file research had been fixed by the WODC at 180 cases. In&lt;br&gt;the thirteen Forensic Psychiatric Centres (FPCs), the cases were randomly sampled from&lt;br&gt;the population present at the hospital at that moment. The number of selected cases for&lt;br&gt;each hospital was determined with a weighting factor. Included in the sample were patients&lt;br&gt;who had entered the hospitals after 1 February 2000. Excluded from the sample were&lt;br&gt;detainees sentenced to TBS who were indicated for long-stay forensic care and detainees&lt;br&gt;sentenced to TBS who were living in the Netherlands illegally. We checked the&lt;br&gt;representativeness for six characteristics: sex, age, offence category, primary disorder,&lt;br&gt;1 In Dutch: ‘terbeschikkingstelling’, abbreviated from here on to ‘TBS’; we will use the untranslated term because of the&lt;br&gt;uniqueness of the Dutch TBS-system) nationality and IQ. Data regarding five of the six characteristics could be provided by the&lt;br&gt;FPCs, except for those regarding IQ; for this reason, the representativeness of the IQ was&lt;br&gt;checked on the basis of the scored file data.&lt;/p&gt;</abstract>
      <sumDscr>
      </sumDscr>
    </stdyInfo>
    <method>
      <dataColl>
      </dataColl>
    </method>
    <dataAccs>
      <useStmt>
      </useStmt>
    </dataAccs>
    <othrStdyMat>
    </othrStdyMat>
  </stdyDscr>
  <fileDscr>
  </fileDscr>
</codeBook>
      </metadata>
      <about>
        <provenance xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/provenance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/provenance http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/provenance.xsd">
    <originDescription harvestDate="2025-12-08T01:31:14Z" altered="true">
      <baseURL>https://ssh.datastations.nl/oai</baseURL>
      <identifier>doi:10.17026/DANS-XG5-P7GZ</identifier>
      <datestamp>2025-12-03T01:00:45Z</datestamp>
      <metadataNamespace>ddi:codebook:2_5</metadataNamespace>
    </originDescription>
</provenance>
      </about>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>