2026-06-12T09:01:53Z https://datacatalogue.cessda.eu/oai-pmh/v0/oai

6e2f6293c17a48a4aa4892c73148b4b8429951422b56af1956be4d6d199a44f1 2026-06-02T13:49:45Z language:enopenaire_data

DDI study level documentation for study 10.7802/2447 Regime and cultural determinants of the acceptance of political decisions in times of crisis (DAPEK) Regime and cultural determinants of the acceptance of political decisions in times of crisis (DAPEK) Regime and cultural determinants of the acceptance of political decisions in times of crisis (DAPEK) 10.7802/244710.7802/244710.7802/244710.7802/2447 Giebler, Heiko Giebler, Heiko Rauh, Christian Rauh, Christian Heisig, Jan Paul Heisig, Jan Paul Carstens, Arne Carstens, Arne Li, Jianghong Li, Jianghong Gerschewski, Johannes Gerschewski, Johannes [Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [=] SCRIPTS (EXC 2055, Project-ID: 390715649)] GESIS Data Archive for the Social SciencesGESIS Datenarchiv für Sozialwissenschaften covid-19value orientationssocietal challengesdecision-making processfreedomcovid-19value orientationssocietal challengesdecision-making processfreedom Under what conditions are people prepared to accept restrictions on their personal freedoms in order to protect their own well-being and health, but above all the well-being and health of others? What do decision-making processes have to look like in order to be regarded as legitimate by citizens? Are there freedoms that people do not want to give up under any circumstances? What role does the democratic quality of a political regime play in these questions, and what is the role of various cultural characteristics? These questions, which refer to the area of tension between individual liberties and collective welfare, arise with particular urgency in view of the worldwide Corona pandemic, but also with a view to future crises, such as the impending climate catastrophe. To study these questions, DAPEK surveyed 9,000 respondents from six countries (Germany, Hungary, Japan, Poland, South Korea, and Spain – 1,500 respondents each) in November 2021. Core of the data collection are two survey experiments. First, a conjoint experiment is designed to analyze which restrictions in pandemic countermeasures affect citizen support. Second, a combination of a best-worst-scaling approach with a framing experiment scrutinizes which political decision-making procedures citizens prefer and whether that varies by different societal challenges. The experimental data are flanked by extensive individual-level data, a.o. on demographics, as well as political and cultural value orientations. DAPEK is a short-term project of the DFG-funded Cluster of Excellence "Contestations of the Liberal Script", which is located at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center, among others. Keywords: covid-19, value orientations, societal challenges, decision-making process, freedomUnder what conditions are people prepared to accept restrictions on their personal freedoms in order to protect their own well-being and health, but above all the well-being and health of others? What do decision-making processes have to look like in order to be regarded as legitimate by citizens? Are there freedoms that people do not want to give up under any circumstances? What role does the democratic quality of a political regime play in these questions, and what is the role of various cultural characteristics? These questions, which refer to the area of tension between individual liberties and collective welfare, arise with particular urgency in view of the worldwide Corona pandemic, but also with a view to future crises, such as the impending climate catastrophe. To study these questions, DAPEK surveyed 9,000 respondents from six countries (Germany, Hungary, Japan, Poland, South Korea, and Spain – 1,500 respondents each) in November 2021. Core of the data collection are two survey experiments. First, a conjoint experiment is designed to analyze which restrictions in pandemic countermeasures affect citizen support. Second, a combination of a best-worst-scaling approach with a framing experiment scrutinizes which political decision-making procedures citizens prefer and whether that varies by different societal challenges. The experimental data are flanked by extensive individual-level data, a.o. on demographics, as well as political and cultural value orientations. DAPEK is a short-term project of the DFG-funded Cluster of Excellence "Contestations of the Liberal Script", which is located at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center, among others. Keywords: covid-19, value orientations, societal challenges, decision-making process, freedom JapanJapanGermanyGermanyHungaryHungaryPolandPolandSpainSpainKorea (Republic of)Korea (Republic of) The population of the study was the voting-age population of the respective country, due to differing age of majority in Korea between 19 and 75 and in Japan between 20 and 75 years, in all other countries between 18 and 75 years, who live there in a private household and have Internet access. cross-sectioncross-section Non-probability Sample - Quota SampleNon-probability Sample - Quota Sample Web-based interviewInterview.WebBasedWebbasiertes InterviewInterview.WebBasedWeb-based experimentExperiment.WebBasedWeb-basiertes ExperimentExperiment.WebBased Free access (without registration) - The research data can be downloaded directly by anyone without further limitations.Freier Zugang (ohne Registrierung) - Die Forschungsdaten können von jedem direkt heruntergeladen werden. http://dbkapps.gesis.org/dbkoai/oai.asp oai:dbk.gesis.org:SDN/10.7802_2447 2023-05-03 ddi:codebook:2_5