2026-10-15T07:51:10Z https://datacatalogue.cessda.eu/oai-pmh/v0/oai

53ed474de2d39e8af88160835b356b5c4b7bf87ada812635417a04cfb9ff41d0 2026-06-02T13:15:54Z language:enopenaire_data

STAR: P0924doi:10.17026/DANS-ZXA-7QB7easy-dataset:32378 https://doi.org/10.17026/DANS-ZXA-7QB7 Legitimering van inrichtingsopvoeding 1986-1987 : Interdoel Linden, L.T. van der, Konijn, C.T.M., Schut, T.J.A., Universiteit van Amsterdam * Amsterdam, Pedagogisch didactisch instituut, vakgroep sociale pedagogiek (primary investigator) <p>Investigation into legitimation of pedagogic aims of residential educational institutes. Using the Delphi-method, a panel of experts, consisting of one staff-member per institute, representatives of referring institutes and external experts, were questioned about the aims of residential educational institutes and future policy regarding function and aims of this kind of educational service. Phase 0 consisted of making an inventory of the characteristic properties of the 14 institutes, the aims of residential youth aid and the policy issues at hand, to result in a common frame of reference for subsequent discussion and a final form for the questionnaire used in phase 1. Phase 1: Each specific expert-category responded to its questionnaire, evaluating and commenting specific aims in the framework of the five common characteristic aspects of the institutes: -national orientation, -closed character, -integrated help, -own educational facilities, -own recreational facilities. Phase 2: G: results of phase 1 were fed into the phase 2 questionnaire to refine discussion. Phase 3: G: results of previous phases resulted in several models for future policy to be evaluated by the expert panel.</p> Social Scienceseducationeducationyouthwelfareservice en 1986-11-24 Dataset https://ssh.datastations.nl/oai doi:10.17026/DANS-ZXA-7QB7 2025-12-03T01:00:38Z ddi:codebook:2_5