<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type='text/xsl' href='/oai/static/oai2.xsl' ?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd">
  <responseDate>2026-04-17T08:14:59Z</responseDate>
  <request identifier="2b1eb25ed0ebf27471323be704c9c50c1a4c017c54e3db300d4d3d51f2fe45d5" metadataPrefix="oai_ddi25" verb="GetRecord">https://datacatalogue.cessda.eu/oai-pmh/v0/oai</request>
  <GetRecord>
    <record>
    <header>
      <identifier>2b1eb25ed0ebf27471323be704c9c50c1a4c017c54e3db300d4d3d51f2fe45d5</identifier>
      <datestamp>2025-10-01T03:06:04Z</datestamp>
      <setSpec>language:en</setSpec><setSpec>openaire_data</setSpec>
    </header>
      <metadata>
        <codeBook xmlns="ddi:codebook:2_5" version="2.5" xsi:schemaLocation="ddi:codebook:2_5 http://www.ddialliance.org/Specification/DDI-Codebook/2.5/XMLSchema/codebook.xsd">
    <docDscr>
      <citation>
        <titlStmt>
          <titl xml:lang="en">DDI study level documentation for study 10.7802/2799 Dataset: Identifying major factors for success and failure of conservation programs in Europe</titl>
        </titlStmt>
        <prodStmt>
        </prodStmt>
        <holdings xml:lang="en" URI="https://search.gesis.org/research_data/SDN-10.7802-2799?lang=en"/><holdings xml:lang="de" URI="https://search.gesis.org/research_data/SDN-10.7802-2799?lang=de"/>
      </citation>
    </docDscr>
  <stdyDscr>
    <citation>
      <titlStmt>
        <titl xml:lang="en">Dataset: Identifying major factors for success and failure of conservation programs in Europe</titl>
        <parTitl xml:lang="de">Dataset: Identifying major factors for success and failure of conservation programs in Europe</parTitl>
        <IDNo xml:lang="en" agency="GESIS">10.7802/2799</IDNo><IDNo xml:lang="de" agency="GESIS">10.7802/2799</IDNo><IDNo xml:lang="en" agency="DOI">10.7802/2799</IDNo><IDNo xml:lang="de" agency="DOI">10.7802/2799</IDNo>
      </titlStmt>
      <rspStmt>
        <AuthEnty affiliation="Central Coordination Office of the BMBF-Research Initiative for the Conservation of Biodiversity (FEdA), Senckenberg Society for Nature Research, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany" xml:lang="en">Taffner, Julian
        </AuthEnty><AuthEnty affiliation="Central Coordination Office of the BMBF-Research Initiative for the Conservation of Biodiversity (FEdA), Senckenberg Society for Nature Research, Senckenberganlage 25, 60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany" xml:lang="de">Taffner, Julian
        </AuthEnty>
      </rspStmt>
      <prodStmt>
        <prodDate xml:lang="en"/>
        <fundAg xml:lang="en">[Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung - BMBF]</fundAg>
      </prodStmt>
      <distStmt>
        <distrbtr abbr="GESIS" URI="http://www.gesis.org/" xml:lang="en">GESIS Data Archive for the Social Sciences</distrbtr><distrbtr abbr="GESIS" URI="http://www.gesis.org/" xml:lang="de">GESIS Datenarchiv für Sozialwissenschaften</distrbtr>
        <distDate xml:lang="en" date="2024"/><distDate xml:lang="de" date="2024"/>
      </distStmt>
      <verStmt>
      </verStmt>
      <holdings xml:lang="en" URI="https://search.gesis.org/research_data/SDN-10.7802-2799?lang=en"/><holdings xml:lang="de" URI="https://search.gesis.org/research_data/SDN-10.7802-2799?lang=de"/>
    </citation>
    <stdyInfo>
      <subject>
        <keyword xml:lang="en">environmental policy</keyword><keyword xml:lang="en">ecology</keyword><keyword xml:lang="en">ecological system</keyword><keyword xml:lang="en">sustainability</keyword><keyword xml:lang="en">conservation</keyword><keyword xml:lang="en">nature reserve</keyword><keyword xml:lang="en">expert survey</keyword><keyword xml:lang="de">environmental policy</keyword><keyword xml:lang="de">ecology</keyword><keyword xml:lang="de">ecological system</keyword><keyword xml:lang="de">sustainability</keyword><keyword xml:lang="de">conservation</keyword><keyword xml:lang="de">nature reserve</keyword><keyword xml:lang="de">expert survey</keyword>
      </subject>
      <abstract xml:lang="en">In Europe, various conservation programs adopted to maintain or restore biodiversity have experienced differing levels of success. However, a synthesis about major factors for success of biodiversity-related conservation programs across ecosystems and national boundaries, such as incentives, subsidies, enforcement, participation, or spatial context, is missing. Using a balanced scorecard survey among experts, we analyzed and compared factors contributing to success or failure of three different conservation programs: two government programs (Natura 2000 and the ecological measures of the Water Framework Directive) and one conservation program of a non-governmental organization (NGO; Rewilding Europe), all focusing on habitat and species conservation. The experts perceived the NGO program as more successful in achieving biodiversity-related aims than governmental conservation legislation. Among the factors perceived to influence the success of biodiversity conservation, several stood out: Biodiversity-damaging subsidies, external economic interests competing with conservation goals or policies conflicting with biodiversity conservation were recognized as major factors for the lack of conservation success. Outreach to raise societal interest and awareness as well as stakeholder involvement were perceived as closely related to the success of programs. Our expert survey demonstrated that external factors from economy and policy often hinder success of conservation programs, while societal and environmental factors rather contribute to it. This study implies that conservation programs should be designed to be as inclusive as possible and provides a basis for developing a standardized methodology that explicitly considers indirect drivers from areas such as economy, policy and society.</abstract><abstract xml:lang="de">In Europe, various conservation programs adopted to maintain or restore biodiversity have experienced differing levels of success. However, a synthesis about major factors for success of biodiversity-related conservation programs across ecosystems and national boundaries, such as incentives, subsidies, enforcement, participation, or spatial context, is missing. Using a balanced scorecard survey among experts, we analyzed and compared factors contributing to success or failure of three different conservation programs: two government programs (Natura 2000 and the ecological measures of the Water Framework Directive) and one conservation program of a non-governmental organization (NGO; Rewilding Europe), all focusing on habitat and species conservation. The experts perceived the NGO program as more successful in achieving biodiversity-related aims than governmental conservation legislation. Among the factors perceived to influence the success of biodiversity conservation, several stood out: Biodiversity-damaging subsidies, external economic interests competing with conservation goals or policies conflicting with biodiversity conservation were recognized as major factors for the lack of conservation success. Outreach to raise societal interest and awareness as well as stakeholder involvement were perceived as closely related to the success of programs. Our expert survey demonstrated that external factors from economy and policy often hinder success of conservation programs, while societal and environmental factors rather contribute to it. This study implies that conservation programs should be designed to be as inclusive as possible and provides a basis for developing a standardized methodology that explicitly considers indirect drivers from areas such as economy, policy and society.</abstract>
      <sumDscr>
        <collDate xml:lang="en" date="2021-12-1" event="start"/><collDate xml:lang="en" date="2022-7-1" event="end"/>
        <universe xml:lang="en" clusion="I">Experten aus verschiedenen für den Biodiversitätsschutz relevanten Bereichen</universe>
      </sumDscr>
    </stdyInfo>
    <method>
      <dataColl>
        <timeMeth xml:lang="en">cross-section<concept/></timeMeth><timeMeth xml:lang="de">cross-section<concept/></timeMeth>
        <sampProc xml:lang="en">Non-probability Sample - Purposive Sample<concept/></sampProc><sampProc xml:lang="de">Non-probability Sample - Purposive Sample<concept/></sampProc>
        <collMode xml:lang="en">Self-administered questionnaire:E-mail<concept/></collMode><collMode xml:lang="de">Self-administered questionnaire:E-mail<concept/></collMode>
      </dataColl>
    </method>
    <dataAccs>
      <useStmt>
        <restrctn xml:lang="en">Free access (without registration) - The research data can be downloaded directly by anyone without further limitations.
CC BY 4.0: Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de)</restrctn><restrctn xml:lang="de">Freier Zugang (ohne Registrierung) - Die Forschungsdaten können von jedem direkt heruntergeladen werden.
CC BY 4.0: Attribution (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de)</restrctn>
      </useStmt>
    </dataAccs>
    <othrStdyMat>
    </othrStdyMat>
  </stdyDscr>
  <fileDscr>
  </fileDscr>
</codeBook>
      </metadata>
      <about>
        <provenance xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/provenance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/provenance http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/provenance.xsd">
    <originDescription harvestDate="2025-10-01T03:06:04Z" altered="true">
      <baseURL>http://dbkapps.gesis.org/dbkoai/oai.asp</baseURL>
      <identifier>oai:dbk.gesis.org:SDN/10.7802_2799</identifier>
      <datestamp>2024-11-26</datestamp>
      <metadataNamespace>ddi:codebook:2_5</metadataNamespace>
    </originDescription>
</provenance>
      </about>
    </record>
  </GetRecord>
</OAI-PMH>