2026-04-15T21:46:07Z https://datacatalogue.cessda.eu/oai-pmh/v0/oai

1f9abc85003c9900f40114caf6e26ff72962824315b591786b95b71e4b7a6233 2025-10-01T03:41:57Z language:enopenaire_data

DDI2.5 XML CODEBOOK RECORD FOR STUDY NUMBER 1273 Postgraduate Students' Assessment of Their Social Science Training, 1971 127310.5255/UKDA-SN-1273-1 Social Science Research Council, Survey Unit No information recorded UK Data Service 01 January 1981 ACADEMIC DEPARTMENTSATTITUDESCALCULATORSDECISION MAKINGDEGREESEDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATIONEDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENTEDUCATIONAL COURSESEDUCATIONAL PERIODICALSEMPLOYMENTGRADUATESINTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATIONLABORATORIESLECTURESLIBRARY FACILITIESMETHODOLOGYOCCUPATIONAL TRAININGREADING (ACTIVITY)RESEARCH FACILITIESRESEARCH GRANTSSEMINARSSOCIAL AND BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCES EDUCATIONSOCIAL RESEARCHSTATISTICS EDUCATIONSUPERVISIONTRAINING Higher and further education <P>Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.</P>The purpose of this study was to investigate postgraduate students' evaluations of the provision made for their studies in their universities.<br><B>Main Topics</B>:<BR>Attitudinal/Behavioural Questions<br> Whether studentship was taken up immediately following first degree, if not how many years elapsed before returning to full time study, details of any intermediate courses, whether would have preferred larger or smaller department in terms of number of faculties/students, which journals in field regularly read, whether postgraduate work has resulted in any publications or papers (details), assessment of quality and rank order of importance of several components of postgraduate training (e.g. lectures, computer/laboratory/library facilities, departmental/contacts), extent to which course has supplied competence in research techniques/ understanding of relevant theory/basis for making judgments about what is important in field/sense of intellectual excitement, whether satisfied with choice of topic/interest, if not - what action would like to take (e.g. change topic/discipline), whether would like/expects to carry out research in next post, type of employment anticipated, degree of relevance of training to expected job.<br> Background Variables<br> Age, sex, marital status, number of years received SSRC grant, place and title of first degree, title of degree course, results (if known), method of examination, thesis/dissertation title.<br> 197101 January 1971 United Kingdom IndividualsGroupsNationalStudents Postgraduate students in the social sciences who had been awarded a grant from the SSRC Cross-sectional (one-time) study No sampling (total universe) Postal survey <p>The Data Collection is available to UK Data Service registered users subject to the <a href="https://ukdataservice.ac.uk/app/uploads/cd137-enduserlicence.pdf" target="_blank">End User Licence Agreement</a>.</p><p>Commercial use of the data requires approval from the data owner or their nominee. The UK Data Service will contact you.</p> See <restrctn> Marsh, A. (1972) <i>Postgraduate students' assessment of their social science training</i>, [Working paper].London: SSRC Survey Unit. Postgraduate students' assessment of their social science training https://oai.ukdataservice.ac.uk:8443/oai/provider 1273 2024-11-28T07:20:53Z ddi:codebook:2_5