2026-04-16T07:47:20Z https://datacatalogue.cessda.eu/oai-pmh/v0/oai

163eca6c7f48f41551ef38f5e3d4a7aaca408cb273df016815e609b4fda4179d 2025-10-01T03:58:47Z language:enopenaire_data

DDI2.5 XML CODEBOOK RECORD FOR STUDY NUMBER 5 Membership of Tribunals, 1971-1972; Supplementary Benefit Appeals Tribunal 510.5255/UKDA-SN-5-1 Sumorok, E., University of Birmingham, Institute of Judicial Administration Hawker, G. N., University of Birmingham, Institute of Judicial Administration Cavenagh, W. E., University of Birmingham, Institute of Judicial Administration Newton, D., University of Birmingham, Institute of Judicial Administration No information recorded Economic and Social Research Council UK Data Service 01 January 1974 ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALSAPPEALS (LAW)EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUNDEMPLOYMENT HISTORYFEESGENDERINCOMEJOB SATISFACTIONMEMBERSHIPPERSONALITYPROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONSQUALIFICATIONSRECRUITMENTSOCIAL SECURITYTRADE UNION MEMBERSHIPVOLUNTARY WORK Elites and leadership Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.The aim of this study was to identify the social characteristics of members of selected administrative tribunals, to compare the members with other citizens involved in public service and to explain the criteria and practical means by which members are selected, or select themselves.Main Topics: Attitudinal/Behavioural Questions The survey assesses member's prior knowledge of, and familiarity with, the work of Appeals Tribunals and method of choice of members (i.e. whether through personal application or through suggestion of individual or organisation). Respondents are asked for their opinion of reasons for their selection, and whether they were appointed as Minister's nominee or as Trades Council nominee. If the member has been promoted to Chairman since his appointment, the importance of remuneration is obtained. If he is an ordinary member, the importance of fee for service and any eventual financial loss to the member through service are ascertained. Respondent, opinion on frequency of sittings of tribunals, necessary experience, qualifications and personal qualities required of a good chairman and effective ordinary member, and own personal satisfaction or dissatisfaction in service are elicited. In a final section, comments are invited on methods of recruiting and selecting members, on changes needed in kinds of people appointed, and on the general work of Tribunals. Background Variables Age, highest formal education or professional qualifications, status of employment (i.e. whether self-employed, employed, retired or housewife), last paid occupation, husband's occupation (if housewife), judicial or semi-judicial or committee experience (with details and dates), membership of professional, occupational or trade union organisations and any voluntary work done during the period, 1962 - 72. A final detailed breakdown of income and salary from all sources completes the information. September 1971 - October 197201 September 197101 October 1972 England and Wales IndividualsGroupsInstitutions/organisationsNationalPublic officials Members of Supplementary Benefit Appeals Tribunals in three of twelve administrative regions in England and Wales: West Midlands, East Midlands and Wales Cross-sectional (one-time) study No sampling (total universe) Postal survey The Data Collection is available to UK Data Service registered users subject to the <a href="https://ukdataservice.ac.uk/app/uploads/cd137-enduserlicence.pdf" target="_blank">End User Licence Agreement</a>.Commercial use of the data requires approval from the data owner or their nominee. The UK Data Service will contact you. See <restrctn> https://oai.ukdataservice.ac.uk:8443/oai/provider 5 2024-11-28T07:25:35Z ddi:codebook:2_5