2026-04-30T06:09:47Z https://datacatalogue.cessda.eu/oai-pmh/v0/oai

07818d72a551a145ce79829cb8fc2fefbb5f4a71bbfa97e126301ff8a21c2c5c 2025-11-03T01:00:56Z language:sllanguage:en

Slovene Public Opinion Survey 2003/4: Arhiv druzboslovnih podatkov ADP, 2025ADP, 2025 ADP DDIADP DDI Slovensko javno mnenje 2003/4 Slovene Public Opinion Survey 2003/4: Slovene Public Opinion Survey 2003/4:: Citizenship / International Survey ISSPSlovensko javno mnenje 2003/4: Razumevanje vloge državljana / Mednarodna raziskava ISSP SJM034URN:SI:UNI-LJ-FDV:ADP:SJM034https://doi.org/10.17898/ADP_SJM034_V1SJM034URN:SI:UNI-LJ-FDV:ADP:SJM034https://doi.org/10.17898/ADP_SJM034_V1 Toš, Niko Toš, Niko 20032003 Ministrstvo za šolstvo, znanost in športMinistry of Education, Science and Sport Univerza v Ljubljani, Arhiv družboslovnih podatkovUniversity of Ljubljana, Slovenian Social Science Data Archives 2. oktober 20252. October 2025 ADP DDIADP DDI Slovensko javno mnenje 2003/4 podoba dobrega državljanamnenje o delovanju skrajneževpolitično in družbeno delovanjeocena demokracijezaupanje v institucijeocena dela Združenih narodovčlovekove praviceocena političih strankvpliv na politično odločanje in izbiroocena javnih službživljenje po vojnahcilji Slovenijematerialne razmerezdravstveno stanjesvobodavarnostvolitvepolitična izključenostevropske volitveocena dela Evropskega Parlamentainformativne oddaje (televizija/radio)branje časopisov in revijIDENTITETAKULTURNA IDENTITETANARODNA IDENTITETAUDELEŽBAUDELEŽBAVOLITVEDEMOKRACIJAINSTITUCIJAZAUPANJEcitizens' perception of the "good citizen"activities of extremistssocial and political participationevaluation of democracytrust in institutionsevaluation of United Nationshuman rightsevaluation of political partiesinfluence on political decision-makingevaluation of public servicelife after wargoals of Sloveniamaterial conditionsmedical conditionfreedomsafetyelectionspolitical exclusionEuropean electionsevaluation of European Parliamentnews broadcast (television / radio)reading newspapers and magazinesIDENTITYCULTURAL IDENTITYNATIONAL IDENTITYPARTICIPATIONATTENDANCEELECTIONSDEMOCRACYINSTITUTIONSTRUST Politične in upravne vedePolitika in sistemi družbene blaginjeRAZUMEVANJE VLOGE DRŽAVLJANARAZUMEVANJE VLOGE DRŽAVE IN OCENE RAZMERVREDNOTE, ZADOVOLJSTVO IN ZAUPANJEODNOS DO POLITIKE, STRANK IN VOLITEVVKLJUČEVANJE V EVROPO IN EVROPSKE VOLITVEMEDIJSKI BLOKDEMOGRAFIJAPolitical and administrative sciencesSocial welfare policy and systemsUNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF A GOOD CITIZENUNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF THE STATE AND EVALUATION OF RELATIONSVALUES, SATISFACTION AND TRUSTATTITUDE TOWARDS POLITICS, POLITICAL PARTIES AND ELECTIONSINTEGRATION IN EUROPE AND EUROPEAN ELECTIONSMEDIA BLOCKDEMOGRAPHY Vlogo državljana lahko raziskujemo vsaj iz dveh vidikov. Lahko jo proučujemo z legalnega vidika ali pa politično kulturne perspektive. Pričujoča raziskava o razumevanju vloge državljana si prizadeva posvetiti se drugemu pristopu. Osredotoči se na državljanovo državljansko in politično identiteto in socialno in politično participacijo. Raziskava vključuje klasično razdelitev na vertikalne in horizontalne podobe demokracije. Vertikalni vidik vključuje odnos med državljanom in političnim sistemom, medtem ko horizontalni vključuje odnos med državljani samimi. Raziskava vključuje vsaj štiri odločilne dimenzije. Prva je državljanovo vrednotenje političnih in demokratskih institucij in državljanska moč. Druga dimenzija obravnava državljanovo percepcijo o pojmih "dobri državljan" in "dobra demokracija". Tretja dimenzija izvira iz horizontalne dimenzije in obravnava družbeno zaupanje in družbeni kapital. Četrta dimenzija obravnava državljanovo družbeno in politično participacijo.There are at least two general approaches to the study of citizenship. It can be analysed from a legal point of view, or it can also be studied from a political culture perspective. The current Citizenship survey endeavours to apply the second approach. The focus is on citizens’ civic and political identities, and social and political participation. The survey covers the classical distinction between the vertical and the horizontal aspects of democracy. The vertical aspect deals with the relation between citizens and the political system, and the horizontal deals with the relations between citizens. The survey contains – at least – four crucial dimensions. The first is citizens’ evaluation of political and democratic institutions and citizens’ empowerment. One aspect of this dimension is covered by questions about people’s trust in institutions and their evaluation of political parties, referendums, election campaigns, corruption and democracy as such. Questions about people’s views of their own ability to deal with political problems and influence political decisions (internal efficacy), and questions about the responsivity of the political system (external efficacy) cover the other aspect. The second dimension deals with citizens’ perceptions of the ‘good citizen’ and the ‘good democracy’. How important do people think rights, duties and obligations are for them and for the good society, and how important is it for them to show civility? It is probable that people’s normative perception about the ‘good citizen’ and the ‘good democracy’ have importance for their evaluation of democratic institutions. On the other hand people’s perception of the ‘good democracy’ may also be influenced or formed by their experience with political institutions. In other words, the two dimensions are closely related and the causal relationship is reciprocal. The third dimension has its offspring in the horizontal dimension and deals with social trust and social capital. To what extent do people trust each other and to what extend are norms of civility internalised? And how does that influence the evaluation of democratic institutions and their effectiveness? The fourth dimension deals with citizens’ social and political participation. This dimension is covered by questions concerning conventional as well as unconventional participation and new modes of participation (e.g., Internet participation and political consumerism). Moreover the survey investigates the extent to which citizens have made attempts to influence political life in the last year, in the distant past, what they might do and what they never would do. The participatory dimension also deals with people’s relation to and participation in different kinds of groups and associations. 4. oktober 200320. november 20034. October 200320. November 2003 SlovenijaSlovenia SlovenijaSlovenia PosameznikIndividualIndividualIndividual Osebe starejše od 18 let, s stalnim prebivališčem v R Sloveniji.Institucionalizirani prebivalci, kot so dijaki in študentje v domovih, osebe na služenju vojaškega roka, osebe na zdravljenju v bolnišnicah in drugi, ki ne živijo na svojem stalnem naslovu.The adult residents of the Republic of Slovenia, older than 18 years, living on permanent address.Institutionalised people. ŠtevilskiNumericNumericNumeric PresečnoCrossSectionCross-sectionCrossSection Verjetnostno: po skupinah: stratificirano slučajnoProbability.Cluster.StratifiedRandomProbability: Cluster: Stratified randomProbability.Cluster.StratifiedRandom Osebni intervju: PAPIInterview.FaceToFace.PAPIFace-to-face interview: Paper-and-pencil (PAPI)Interview.FaceToFace.PAPI Polstrukturiran vprašalnikStandardiziran vprašalnik z večino vprašanj zaprtega tipaQuestionnaire.SemistructuredSemi-structured questionnairestandardized questionnaire with mostly closed questionsQuestionnaire.Semistructured Arhiv izroča podatke uporabnikom samo za namen, ki ga posebej opredelijo, ob zagotovitvi spoštovanja profesionalnih etičnih kodeksov. Uporabnik se posebej zaveže, da bo skrbel za tajnost podatkov in opravljal analize brez poskusov identifikacije posameznika.Users may use the data only for the purposes stated in the registration form and in accordance with professional codes of ethics. Users expressly agree to maintain the confidentiality of the data and to conduct analyses without attempting to identify the individuals and institutions covered by the materials. Pri objavah, ki bi sledile na podlagi podatkov, je treba polno citirati avtorja in Arhiv.The users should acknowledge in any publication both the original depositors and the Archive. Vsak uporabnik je dolžan opozoriti na morebitne pomanjkljivosti gradiva.Users are requested to notify the Archive of any errors discovered in the materials. Uporabnik naj pred uporabo pozorno prebere spremljajočo dokumentacijo in se v primeru nejasnosti obrne na avtorje raziskave ali Arhiv.In case of ambiguity the users of the data set are advised to contact principal investigators or Archive. Slovensko javno mnenje 2003/4: Razumevanje vloge državljana, Mednarodna raziskava ISSP [Podatki (P)] Slovensko javno mnenje 2003/4: Razumevanje vloge državljana, Mednarodna raziskava ISSP [Data (P)] http://127.0.0.1:6003/v0/oai SJM034 2025-10-23T19:53:20Z ddi:codebook:2_5